Why Germany should be destroyed
view of the dark ages (cheap) that come back strongly to the fore, I propose an article from 'excellent blog
Gianluca Freda, that struck me inexorably forcing me to revise the conclusions alternatives studied than the two world wars and in general on the recent history of the world, during my school years.
In light of the information published in this article, very well translated by the author of the post, it is clear the history (that which is studied on the books) is written by the victors, and that is not so obvious that the demonic forces of evil are were "only" those Nazis. Indeed.
Article obliges us to consider the fact that, during any war, somebody wins and somebody loses, and we know this, but nobody ever told us that there are those who always wins, whatever the outcome of the war. E ' Scientific, as the casino, the dealer wins.
Always.
Good reading.
IN GERMANY AS Bankruptcy He solved his financial problems
Ellen Brown
site
www.webofdebt.com Translated by Gianluca Freda
"We were not foolish enough to create a currency [related to '] gold, of which we have available, but for every mark we required the printed equivalent of a mark in business or in goods produced ... We have to laugh every time our national financiers argue that the value of the currency must be set by gold or by goods stored in the coffers of the state bank. "
(Adolf Hitler, quoted in "Hitler's Monetary System", www.rense.com , citing CC Veith, Citadels of Chaos , Meador, 1949)
What
Guernsey was not the only government to solve its infrastructure problems by printing its own money alone. (See E. Brown, "Waking Up on a Minnesota Bridge," www.webofdebt.com / articles / infrastructure-crisis.php , of August 4, 2007). A model known much more can be found in Germany out of the First World War. When Hitler came to power, the country was completely, hopelessly ruined . The Treaty of Versailles had imposed on German reparations to the people who had destroyed, with which it was intended to reimburse the costs of participation in the war all the belligerent countries. costs amounting to three times the value of all properties in the country . Speculation in the German mark had caused its collapse, precipitating a ruinous inflation of the phenomena of modernity. At its peak, a wheelbarrow piena di banconote, per l’equivalente di 100 miliardi di marchi, non bastava a comprare nemmeno un tozzo di pane. Le casse dello stato erano vuote ed enormi quantità di case e di fattorie erano state sequestrate dalle banche e dagli speculatori. La gente viveva nelle baracche e moriva di fame. Nulla di simile era mai accaduto in precedenza: la totale distruzione di una moneta nazionale, che aveva spazzato via i risparmi della gente, le loro attività e l’economia in generale. A peggiorare le cose arrivò, alla fine del decennio, la depressione globale. La Germania non poteva far altro che soccombere alla schiavitù del debito e agli strozzini internazionali.
O almeno così seemed. Hitler and National Socialists, who came to power in 1933, thwarted the international banking cartel starting to print their own currency. This took their cue from Abraham Lincoln that had financed the Civil War with American-issued paper money, which were called "Greenbacks" . Hitler began his national credit program by devising a plan of public works. Projects earmarked for funding included flood control, the renovation of public buildings and private houses and the construction of new buildings, roads, bridges, canals and port facilities. The cost di tutti questi progetti fu fissato a un miliardo di unità della valuta nazionale. Un miliardo di biglietti di cambio non inflazionati, chiamati Certificati Lavorativi del Tesoro. Questa moneta stampata dal governo non aveva come riferimento l’oro, ma tutto ciò che possedeva un valore concreto. Essenzialmente si trattava di una ricevuta rilasciata in cambio del lavoro e delle opere che venivano consegnate al governo. Hitler diceva: “Per ogni marco che viene stampato, noi abbiamo richiesto l’equivalente di un marco di lavoro svolto o di beni prodotti” . I lavoratori spendevano poi i certificati in altri beni e servizi, creando lavoro per altre persone.
Nell’arco of two years, the unemployment problem had been resolved and the country was back on its feet. He had a strong and stable currency, no debt, no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the U.S. and other Western countries were still unemployed and living assistance. Germany also managed to restore its trade with foreign countries, although foreign banks deny the reality of the credit should face international economic boycott. He succeeded by using the barter system : goods and services were exchanged directly with other countries, circumventing the international banks. This system of direct exchange occurred without creating debt or deficit commercial. Germany's economic experiment, like Lincoln's, was short-lived, but left some lasting monuments to its success, such as the famous Autobahn, the world's first network of highways with a large extension (1).
Hjalmar Schacht, who was then the head of the German central bank, is often quoted a saying that sums up the German version of the miracle of the "Greenback." An American banker had told him: "Dr. Schacht, you should come to America. Here we have a lot of money and this is the right way to manage a banking system. " Schacht said, "You should come to Berlin. There is not have money. And 'this is the true way to manage a banking system "(2).
Although Hitler is rightly referred to infamy in the history books, he was quite popular with the German people, at least at first. Stephen Zarlenga in The Lost Science of Money said that this was due to the fact that he temporarily rescued Germany British economic theories. The theories under which the money must be exchanged on the basis of the gold reserves held by a cartel of private banks rather than printed directly from the government (3). According to the Canadian researcher Henry Makow , this was probably the main reason why Hitler had to be stopped ; ra and he managed to bypass the international bankers and create its own currency . Makow quotes a 1938 interrogation of CG Rakovsky, one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism and intimate of Trotsky, who ended up on trial in the USSR under Stalin. According Rakovsky, the rise of Hitler had in fact been financed by international bankers , through their agent Hjalmar Schacht, the purpose of controlling Stalin, who had usurped the power to their agent Trotsky. But Hitler was later to become a threat even greater than that represented by Stalin when he made the bold step to start printing its own money . Rakovsky said:
"[Hitler] had seized the privilege of making money, and money not only physical but also financial, had seized the untouchable mechanism of falsification and put him to work for the good of the state ... if this situation had come to infect other states ... You can imagine the implications of counter-revolutionary " (4).
economist Henry CK Liu wrote about the incredible transformation in Germany:
"The Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, a time when the economy was in total collapse, with disastrous postwar compensation obligations and zero prospects for the credit and foreign investment. Yet, through an independent monetary policy sovereignty and a public works program that guaranteed full employment, the Third Reich managed to turn a bankrupt Germany, deprived even of colonies to exploit, the strongest economy in Europe, only four years, even before the expenditure on armaments " (5).
In Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People [Miliardi per le Banche, Debito per i Popoli], (1984), Sheldon Emry commenta:
“Dal 1935 in poi, la Germania iniziò a stampare una moneta libera dal debito e dagli interessi, ed è questo che spiega la sua travolgente ascesa dalla depressione alla condizione di potenza mondiale in soli 5 anni. La Germania finanziò il proprio governo e tutte le operazioni belliche, dal 1935 al 1945, senza aver bisogno di oro né di debito, e fu necessaria l’unione di tutto il mondo capitalista e comunista per distruggere il potere della Germania sull’Europa e riportare l’Europa sotto the heel of the bankers. This case even today, more money does not appear in the texts of public schools ".
ANOTHER LOOK hyperinflation of Weimar
In modern texts speak of the disastrous inflation that hit in 1923 of the Weimar Republic (which is known as the republic that governed the Germany from 1919 to 1933). The radical devaluation of the German mark is cited in the text as an example of what can happen when governments are given the unchecked power to print its own money on their own. This is why it is cited, but on the whole world economy, things are not what they seem. The financial crisis began with the Weimar impossible compensation obligations imposed by the Treaty of Versailles . Schacht, who was then in charge of the mint of the Republic, complained:
"The Treaty of Versailles is an ingenious system of measures which seek to destroy Germany's economic ... The Reich was unable to find a way to keep afloat different dall'espediente inflation to continue to print money ".
This was what he stated at the beginning. But Zarlenga writes that Schacht, in his 1967 book The Magic of Money , decided "to bring out the truth, writing in German some remarkable revelations that they tear the" conventional wisdom "propagated by the financial community about hyperinflation German " (6). Schacht revealed that the bank was Reich, owned by private individuals, and not the German government pumped new money into the economy. How the Federal Reserve American Bank Reich was acting so under the supervision of government officials, but made for purposes of private profit. This inflation that turned the war in hyperinflation was speculation by foreign investors, selling brands in the short term bets on the value of their loss. The financial mechanism known as short-term sale, speculators borrow something that does not possess, sell, and then "cover" the costs buying back at lower prices. The speculation in the German mark was made possible by the fact that the Bank Reich made massive amounts of cash available for loans , brands that were created from scratch noting income in the bank records and then lending at interest advantageous. When the Bank Reich could no longer cope with the voracious demand for marks, other private banks were allowed to create them from scratch and to provide, in turn, interest in (7).
According to Schacht, therefore, not only did the government cause to the hyperinflation of Weimar, but it was the government who kept it under control. The Bank of the Reich were imposed stringent government regulations and immediate corrective measures were taken to stop foreign speculation, by eliminating the possibility of easy access to loans of money made by the banks. Hitler then went back in the sixth country with his Treasury Certificates, printed by the government on the model of the U.S. Greenback.
Schacht disapproved the issuance of currency by the government and was removed from his post at the Reichsbank when he refused to support it (which probably saved him at the Nuremberg Trials). But later in his memoirs, he had to recognize that allowing the government to print the money it needed had not produced all the expected inflation by economic theory . He theorized that it was due to the fact that the farms were still idle, and people without jobs. In this he found himself in agreement with John Maynard Keynes: when the resources to increase production were available, do not add liquidity to the economy caused the price increase at all, it causes the growth of goods and services. Supply and demand grew hand in hand, leaving prices unchanged .
1 - Matt Koehl, "The Good Society?" Www.rense.com (January 13, 2005); Stephen Zarlenga, The Lost Science of Money ( Valat , New York: American Monetary Institute, 2002), pages 590-600.
2 - John Weitz Hitler's Banker (UK: Warner Books, 1999).
3 - S. Zarlenga, op. cit.
4 - Henry Makow, "Hitler Did Not Want War," www.savethemales.com (March 21, 2004).
5 - Henry CK Liu, "Nazism and the German Economic Miracle," Asia Times (May 24, 2005).
6 - Stephen Zarlenga, "'s 1923 Hyperinflation: A 'Private' Affair, "Barnes Review (July-August 1999), David Kidd," How Money Is Created in, "http://dkd.net/davekidd/politics/money.html (2001).
7 - Stephen Zarlenga, "'s 1923 Hyperinflation", op. cit.
0 comments:
Post a Comment