Thursday, September 9, 2010

Brochure: Multi-aspirator, Kice Ind

squalene for immunization The 2010/2011 flu


After I had plenty of evidence of harm from vaccination anti-flu in Australia (at least as soon as possible to translate the most relevant parts of this article more punctual ) I did a search for precise information on the composition of influenza vaccine that will be distributed in Italy.

Well on the government website at the time I found nothing, the only page where I found mention of the word composition explains only reality which strains the vaccine should protect: http://www.salute.gov.it / flu / newsInfluenza.jsp? id = 1160 & menu = inevidenza & language = Italian (but if any of my readers find some other document, please inform more Pecina).

searched and researched but I ended up a document of the Society for Health of the Campania region (private entity, but operates only in favor of the public region of Campania, see its home page ).

beginning of this document (special conditions, supply of influenza vaccines, the vaccination campaign, 2010/2011 and 2011/2012) we read that:

This chapter lays down the arrangements for the supply of influenza vaccine for the vaccination campaigns 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 required the Health and hospital of the Campania Region, an amount equal to estimated annual 4,407,534.90 plus VAT (biennial Amount 8,815,069.80 plus VAT). The influenza vaccination campaign will begin once the new vaccine available after marketing authorization by the competent authorities. The types and quantities of vaccine are listed in Annex B1, which forms an integral part of this chapter.


And here in Annex B1 appears second in the table a

influenza vaccine contains antigens determined annually by WHO. Inactivated adjuvanted vaccine doses (MF59C1) in ampoule-syringe - Quantity: 153,450 - price based auction 5:30


Okay it is clear that in this document provides for the purchase, only for the Campania region, of the 153,450 doses of vaccine adjuvanted with MF59C1.

you say anything? Do not you remember more than the acronym used to describe the dangerous adjuvant to squalene and polysorbate , already used in the notorious swine influenza vaccines ?

Since we provided you with the clarification given in this regard by a doctor on site medicitalia (http://www.medicitalia.it/consulti/Pneumologia/116564/Sogetto-a-rischio-influenza-a):


the symbol MF59C1 not 'more than an adjuvant that is used to make the solution and then injected soluble and is' made up exactly: 9.75 mg squalene, 1.175 mg polysorbate 80, sorbitan trioleate 1.175 mg, 0.66 mg of citrate sodium, 0.04 mg of citric acid and water for injections .

Note that in this document (the special conditions, the supply of influenza vaccines) are third in the table a

influenza vaccine contains antigens determined annually by WHO. Intradermal dose non-adjuvanted vaccine vial 15mcg packed the syringe
- Quantity: 15,000 - Base Price Auction 5:30

So you A vaccine is perfectly similar system but with a substantial difference, the absence dell'adiuvante. The base price auction is exactly the same but, and here is another difference, they are required only 15,000 doses, or a tenth of what comparable containing squalene.

fully read the table we see in reality the presence of other approximately 925,000 doses of vaccine is not indicated as required in the presence of adjuvants (there but I would put my hand on fire that there is even a little aluminum in the form of Aloha ).

In total we therefore about 44% of flu vaccines containing squalene. Waiting to know exactly if they contain mercury and / or other harmful substances (such as certain antibiotics included in the composition of the vaccine marketed in Australia, the United States and Bretanga), this is already a very worrying.

Note also that Campania is a region which has about 6 million inhabitants, and that the total doses of vaccine in the table are nearly one million and seven hundred thousand. If they all get fed at a rate of 28% of people veccinate. And this for an ordinary flu, a disease that can lead to serious complications in only a few restricted groups at risk seems at least a huge waste of money.

But we suspect that, as in the case of swine flu , are good reasons other .

0 comments:

Post a Comment